|




















|
Whether you’d like to avoid the IRS, contact the
IRS, settle with the IRS or just want to refer a friend, relative or
client, we would love to hear from you. |
| |
|
Tax Times
Newsletter - June 2008
|
 |
Whether you would like to avoid the IRS, contact the IRS, settle
with the IRS, or just want to refer a friend, relative or client, I
would be happy to provide you or that special person you refer a no-obligation
confidential consultation to explain every option available to them
to solve their IRS problem.
- Jay Schlichting
|
|
We help real people with real tax issues - successfully.
TOP NEWS
- New IRS Commissioner Committed to Enforcement
Here’s some bad news for taxpayers who thought the
IRS’s increasingly aggressive enforcement tactics would end in
the near future: Those tactics won’t end any time soon.
The reason is simple. The Internal Revenue Service now
has proof that tough-as-nails enforcement is increasing tax
revenues.
According to recently released statistics, the total
U.S. income tax in 2006 increased 10.6 percent to $1 trillion,
and total tax liability rose 10.3 percent to $1.1 trillion,
compared to 2005 numbers.
What’s more, in a recent speech to the American Bar
Association, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman didn’t mince
words. “One thing I want to make clear is that during my
tenure at the IRS, I will continue to support a strong
enforcement program,” he said. Shulman plans to stay
aggressive in areas where the IRS has already flexed its
enforcement muscle. In his own words:
- Abusive tax shelters: “As these cases have shown, we are
entering a new phase of dealing with tax shelter issues. In the
first phase, the IRS aggressively rooted out abusive tax
shelters and brought some significant cases. In the next phase,
a number of taxpayers acknowledged that participating in these
shelters was a mistake and settled. In this new phase, we have
pursued those holdouts who chose not to settle and the cases are
working their way through the courts. The government has won the
overwhelming majority of these cases.”
- Crackdown on corporate noncompliance: “The public has a
right to expect that large corporations be good corporate
citizens and meet their compliance obligations.”
- Audits of nation’s high-income taxpayers: “Over the next
several years, we will need to continue to do more research so
that we can target non-compliance and ensure that we are using
our resources effectively and efficiently.”
- Movement of money across borders: “The cross border
migration of capital and people has made this a more integrated
world and the IRS needs to ensure it has the tax administration
capabilities to deal with the fast pace of change.”
A lot of talk, right? Maybe. But given that aggressive
enforcement by the IRS helped boost tax revenues by 10 percent
in just one year, don’t be too certain Shulman is boasting.
He’s likely saber-rattling.
- Personal Trainer Faces 10 Years
A Boca Raton, Fla., personal trainer has pleaded guilty
to a $7 million human growth hormone scheme and tax fraud.
Patrick Bronder admitted his participation in a scheme to
illegally distribute human growth hormone and commit income tax
evasion for calendar year 2001. At sentencing, Bronder faces a
maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of $500,000.
From April 2001 to June 2002, Bronder sold drugs to a
pharmaceutical wholesaler for more than $6.8 million. During the
same period, Bronder received additional compensation of
$325,000 from the same pharmaceutical wholesaler for the sale of
prescription drugs. Bronder instructed the wholesaler to send
more than $3.3 million in payments to a bank in the Bahamas. He
then brought the money back to the United States by making more
than 3,000 ATM withdrawals — a scheme intended to conceal the
income from the IRS.
He faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $100,000.
- CEO Sentenced for Laundering, Evasion
A North Andover, Mass., man was sentenced to three
years of probation for money laundering and filing a false tax
return. Frank P. Magliochetti, 50, must spend the first
six months of his probation in home confinement, pay a $50,000
fine and $330,000 of restitution, and forfeit $1 million.
According to government evidence, Magliochetti, while
in 2002 president of Med Diversified Inc., a home health care
company that was then publicly traded on the American Stock
Exchange, he laundered $330,000 in funds that he had converted
from Med Diversified in order to conceal the source of those
funds. In addition, Magliochetti filed a false tax return for
2002 in order to conceal the source of those funds and on that
tax return falsely identified those funds as a capital gain.
- N.C. Exec Charged with Tax Conspiracy
A North Carolina corporate executive has been charged
with tax conspiracy. From January 2005 to January 2008,
James O. McLamb Jr., 41, of Raleigh, North Carolina, and others
collected and withheld federal taxes from individual employers
on behalf of employees, then prepared false and fraudulent
documents to mislead the IRS, causing Castleton to unlawfully
retain these federal taxes instead of remitting them to the IRS.
“The mission of the IRS is to apply the tax laws with
integrity and fairness to all,” said IRS Special Agent in Charge
Charles E. Hunter. “This means all taxpayers should pay their
fair share. Large corporations and their officers are not above
this.” He faces up to five years in prison and a fine of
up to $25,000.
- Liquor Store Owner Did Not Report $100,000 in Income
A Connecticut man who did not report more than $100,000
in income has received three years of probation. He must serve
the first six months in home confinement. Gurdev S. Kaura,
55, of Naugatuck, Conn., also must perform 150 hours of
community service during his term of probation.
According to court records, during 2005, Kaura owned
and operated Fairfield Wine and Liquor, a liquor store in
Waterbury, Conn. Kaura was also employed as a maintenance worker
for Pratt and Whitney in East Hartford, where he received W-2
wages.
Kaura signed and filed a false federal tax return. In
the return, Kaura falsely represented that his total taxable
income was $8,136 when, in fact, his total taxable income was
$123,812, the difference resulting primarily from his willful
failure to report approximately $117,330 of proceeds from his
liquor business. This resulted in a tax loss of $32,955 to the
Internal Revenue Service.
As part of the resolution of this matter, Kaura has
agreed to forfeit $87,431 and pay an additional $67,249 in
monies due and owing on the tax return, which includes
approximately $33,000 of outstanding interest and civil
penalties.
- COLO. Insurance Agent Evaded Taxes
Cindy L. Beyersdorf, 47, of Northglenn, Colo., was
sentenced to five years of probation and 300 hours of community
service for filing a false federal income tax return. She
was also ordered to pay $51,684.97 in restitution to the IRS.
Beyersdorf was indicted by a federal grand jury pleaded guilty
to the charge.
A licensed insurance agent in Colorado, Beyersdorf
owned and operated Horizons Insurance, a sole proprietorship.
According to the plea agreement, Beyersdorf signed and filed an
individual tax return for calendar year 2001 that falsely
represented the gross receipts from the operation of Horizons
Insurance as $14,888 when in fact the gross receipts were
$87,878.
Beyersdorf further acknowledged that her 2002 and 2003
tax returns similarly understated Horizons Insurance’s gross
receipts and admitted that her criminal conduct caused a tax
loss greater than $30,000.
“It is important for people to have confidence that
when they pay their taxes, their neighbors and competitors will
do the same,” said Terry L. Stuart, Special Agent in Charge of
the IRS-Criminal Investigation, Denver Field Office.
- Indy Woman Receives 24 Months: Tax Scheme
Tinisha Robinson, 32, of Indianapolis, Ind., was
sentenced to 24 months in prison after pleading guilty to tax
charges. From January 2003 to May 2007, Robinson paid
people in the Indianapolis area for use of their Social Security
numbers and addresses. She then filled out a tax return in the
person’s name with false W-2s and other documentation and filed
that with the IRS, claiming a refund due, usually for about
$2,000. When the refund check arrived, the person would sign it
over to Robinson for a nominal fee of $200 to $300.
About $67,000 of these fraudulent refunds were traced
directly to bank accounts in Robinson’s name. Twenty-nine
returns and accompanying W-2s were false, and many of the people
used as conduits for the false return scheme corroborated the
details of the scheme.
- MISS. Woman Filed False Tax Return
Patricia A. Burnett, of Jackson, Miss., was sentenced
for filing a false tax return in 2003. Burnett was sentenced to
serve three years of probation, including a six-month term of
home confinement. “We should not expect the honest taxpayer to
foot the bill for those who hide income from the IRS,” IRS
Special Agent in Charge Michael J. De Palma said.
- Ala. Woman Gets 33 Months Tax Charges
Beverly Ann Byers, 46, of Leeds, Ala., was sentenced to
33 months in prison and ordered to pay $249,454 in restitution
to her former employer, Plateau Construction Company. As the
bookkeeper for Plateau, she mailed 44 letters containing
unauthorized company checks to herself and to pay her personal
bills. These checks totaled $249,454, and she failed to report
approximately $90,576 of the embezzled funds on her 2004 income
tax return.
- ASK THE EXPERTS:
Question:
I owe a substantial amount in back taxes to the IRS, and the two
programs I keep hearing and reading about are the Offer in
Compromise and the Installment Agreement. What’s the difference?
Answer: The difference is enormous, and determining
which program is right for you will depend entirely on the
amount you owe to the IRS and your current financial situation.
No matter which program is right for you, the first
step you should take is to see a qualified tax professional. He
or she will analyze your previous returns to make sure you are
not obligating yourself to pay the IRS even a penny more than
you owe. After all, why should you go in negotiating with Uncle
Sam holding a hand that isn’t even yours? Now, here’s the
deal on the programs:
The Offer in Compromise is available for taxpayers who,
for whatever reason, amassed a serious amount of debt and now
lack the financial means to pay it off. Instead of having to
chase down the taxpayer for decades on end, the IRS can use the
Offer in Compromise program. This allows the IRS and the
taxpayer to come to an agreement on a settlement amount that
will eliminate the tax debt once and for all. This settlement
amount often is for pennies on the dollar, and you should have a
qualified tax professional with you to negotiate this.
For those who don’t qualify for the Offer in
Compromise, the Installment Agreement allows indebted taxpayers
to come to an agreement with the IRS that allows them to pay
down their tax debt over time. Think of it like a car payment: a
substantial but not life-altering monthly payment that over time
will take care of your debt.
|
|
Tax Times Newsletter is an online Publication
by
The Schlichting Group
Specialists in IRS Representation and Tax Preparation
|
|